PROPOSED SUBMISSION LOCAL PLAN 2006-2028 - Aug 12

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

2449 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
P J & P A Lockhart Smith 13 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? Yeovil Sustainable Urban Extension Future Masterplanning Future Masterplanning and Policy YV2

  • Comment ID: 2442
  • Response Type: Support
LATE REPRESENTATION We support the recommendations of the South Somerset Local Plan. The southern urban extension seems more sensible in that the proposed development relates well to the town centre of Yeovil with good proximity to Yeovil Junction Station and with proposed new walking and cycling routes. The proposed development also relates well to the existing housing and road network. We think that the Chithorne Domer site is too remote and would be difficult to integrate with the rest of
M Card 13 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? Yeovil Sustainable Urban Extension Future Masterplanning Future Masterplanning and Policy YV2

  • Comment ID: 2447
  • Response Type: Object
LATE REPRESENTATION The reasons for my objection is due to the fact that the land planned to be built on is important Grade A agricultural land and as such will be a great waste of this very useful land for local businesses to use for crop growing etc as this type of land is only reducing in availability as time goes on. Many new businesses have started up recently in this line of work as the locals now seek out more than ever to eat locally produced items and also to support the local business
SWarman 13 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? Yeovil Sustainable Urban Extension Future Masterplanning Future Masterplanning and Policy YV2

  • Comment ID: 2433
  • Response Type: Object
LATE REPRESENTATION I feel extremely saddened and very angry that the site for development within East Coker Parish could even be considered for 'Urban Extension', as almost the entire area is Grade 1 Agricultural Land. As you are no doubt aware, this is the highest quality and most versatile farming land! Who would even consider destroying such a valuable site, to slap millions of tonnes of concrete on such a precious area destroying it forever would be completely criminal in my view. We are a
S W Lucy 13 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Market Towns - Vision and Proposals Primary Market Towns - Ilminster What will the Local Plan Deliver? Ilminster - What will the Local Plan Deliver? Policy PMT3

  • Comment ID: 2443
  • Response Type: Object
LATE REPRESENTATION I suggest that it suits Ilminster's new houses proposals best if they went 175 to the West and 175 to the East - or thereabouts. Run out of time!
Mr Brian W Bower 13 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? Yeovil Sustainable Urban Extension Future Masterplanning Future Masterplanning and Policy YV2

  • Comment ID: 2448
  • Response Type: Object
LATE REPRESENTATION I object to the following in the above Local Plan. There has been no proper evaluation of brown field site and this development will be a blot on our beautiful countryside and take up good first grade farming land also will cause traffic congestion in the village of East Coker and in the whole area. Our hospital and local medical facilities are already stretched to the limit and this will just add to the problem of the elderly trying to get medical treatment. Any possibil
D Gorringe 11 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? Yeovil Sustainable Urban Extension Future Masterplanning Future Masterplanning and Policy YV2

  • Comment ID: 2438
  • Response Type: Object
LATE REPRESENTATION I still believe the proposed development in south Yeovil between the villages of Barwick and East Coker to be an unsuitable development both in its scale and location for a number of reasons. 1. Population The population of Yeovil has already increased dramatically over the last 30 to 40 years with recent large building developments taking place on the Abbey Manor Estate, Lufton and Houndstone estates, Lyde Road and the Wyndham Estate. The Thorne Lane/Brimsmore Development
A G & J L Harwood 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? Yeovil Sustainable Urban Extension Future Masterplanning Future Masterplanning and Policy YV2

  • Comment ID: 1389
  • Response Type: Object
SOUTH SOMERSET LOCAL PLAN 2006 — 2028 (Urban Extension). WE OBJECT to the above Local Plan on the grounds that the following issues have been inadequately addressed or with considerations leading to unsound conclusions:- TRANSPORT. WE OBJECT TO THE FOUNDATIONS ON WHICH TRANSPORT CONSIDERATIONS HAVE BEEN MADE: The Atkins report shows that when the surveys were undertaken 50% to 70% of all traffic in peak hours passed straight through Yeovil and loading the main arteries East West A30, No
Probiotics International Ltd 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Rural Centres - Vision and Proposals South Petherton What will the Local Plan Deliver? South Petherton - What will the Local Plan Deliver?

  • Comment ID: 1394
  • Response Type: Support
South Petherton / What Will the Local Plan Deliver /Employment : Comments in support of the following text as follows: 7.63 & 7.65 - Strongly support the provision of 2 ha of additional employment land within South Petherton to be delivered on a 'development management' basis as set out within our representations to Policy SS3 and its supporting text. 7.64 Strongly support the continued historical association of the Lopen Head Nursery site as part of the employment land provision for South Pe
Cllr M Fysh 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Introduction What is the Local Plan? What is the Local Plan?

  • Comment ID: 2287
  • Response Type: Object
I OBJECT to the South Somerset submission Local Plan and the policies therein ("the Plan"). The Plan is not sound or deliverable and is not compliant with European or UK law, regulations or national policy, in particular the NPPF. It is not positive, effective, or justified. It is not based on realistic assumptions or up to date or sufficient evidence, and the assessments made within it are not objective.
Rob Boyden 10 Aug 2012

Proposed Submission Local Plan 2006-2028 Yeovil - Vision and Proposals What should the Local Plan deliver? East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone East Coker and North Coker Buffer Zone and Policy YV3

  • Comment ID: 1400
  • Response Type: Object
Objection 7. The proposed 'Buffer Zone' for East Coker has no legal status and is therefore not sustainable.
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page